Are 90s Subarus now too valuable to modify?

Are 90s Subarus now too valuable to modify?

With the oldest Subaru WRXs nearing 30 years old many people consider cars of Japan’s epic 1990 performance era collectable classics. like Skyline GT-Rs, Mazda FD RX-7s, JZA80 Supras, Honda NSXs and DC2 Integra Type Rs, whose values have all shot up in recent times.

So this raises the question of whether these cars, which we have all loved modifying through the years to suit our personal taste or to make them better to drive, should be preserved in factory-fresh condition as classic cars... or are we free to keep personalising them?

One car which has always had strong monetary value in Australia is the limited-edition STi coupe. Aussies got their first official taste of STi Impreza goodness when Subaru Australia brought 400 Version 5 2-door STi coupes in and sold them all in about 35-seconds. (Well it was actually 399 that made it due to rumours one fell off the boat!)

These were the hot sauce 206kW jobbies, up from the already-rapid 160kW WRX, although they were plauged early on with engine failures as somebody forgot to inform Subaru Japan we don't have 100RON fuel Down Under (thanks, Kevin!).

These were followed by 400 4dr Version 6 sedans in 2000, before the STi Impreza joined the WRX as a regular model in 2001 with the launch of the GD as a 2002 model Down Under. Today, mint condition, dead-stock examples of the Ver.5 and Ver.6 Aussie-delivered STis command a premium as so many were modified back in the day. 

We've already seen prices for the Australia-only Liberty RS Turbo bottom-out a few years ago and values for mint surviving examples of this rare early 90s beastie are climbing every year. And, given its rarity and position in Aussie performance car history it is easy to understand why.

But, as with many "classic cars" (especially stuff from the 1960s) they're not great to drive in stock trim today. The brakes are weak, handling soggy, nobody has cassettes to play in the crappy stereo, and 147kW doesn't feel rocketship fast like it did in 1993.  Some will argue this is all part of the charm of classics, but what if you could keep the 90s look but update how the car feels to drive? 

Will we see people modifying their 90s Japanese heroes in ways that can be reversed, similar to how some muscle car owners now strive to keep the original bones of the car so as not to hurt the value? Or should we just enjoy our cars however we damn well want?

Personally, I see nothing wrong with taking what Subaru gave us and making it bullet-proof. Let's face it, the beauty of Subarus is you can literally bolt a better drivetrain and handling package in, which is completely reversable!

If you're reading this chances are you're a fan of modifying cars, so you won't hold it against us if we turn the wick up on this 2 door STI and make it even more epic than when it left the factory! If you haven't seen the new episode, check it out here!

 

 

 


67 comments

  • Bagi

    Love your show!
    Just take of the stock parts you want to modify. Like the motor with subframe front and back suspension and put them in storage. And use only bolt in parts
    Problems solved

  • Shane

    Make it look like a Subaru impreza 22B

  • Neil

    Modify it but make it easy to return to stock. Don’t get rid of original parts, etc.

  • Paul Sefton

    It’s your car and your money. It’s not like it has the original engine anyway. I think when you get to around 50 years old you might think “wow did I do that to that classic”. In the end whatevs. Been watching since season 2 and you have a great recipe for a great program. Keep doing what you want. It is working well for you. Peace

  • Peter C

    My vote is to modify. You look at the muscle cars that are being outfitted with modern amenities and selling for huge amounts at auctions compared to untouched ones with matching numbers. Younger generations of buyers who can now afford classics do not seem to care as much about keeping the cars original. So my vote is modify away.

Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published

x